Veloxity Posted December 26, 2013 Share Posted December 26, 2013 Well I hear all these people saying how you get better performance with beamNG instead of ror and vise versa so I am going to simplify this If you have a non gaming or really old gaming pc, you will see better performance in ror then in BeamNG If you have a recent gaming pc, then you will see better performance in BeamNG then ror I don't get why this is such a debate... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NavySonicShell Posted December 26, 2013 Share Posted December 26, 2013 I don't think I've seen this debate at all since it came out... But really in general BeamNG will run slower than RoR. It depends on track, settings etc, but since beamng has newer more complex physics, and better graphics, it will run atleast a bit slower on comparable maps/settings/cars etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crushker Posted December 26, 2013 Share Posted December 26, 2013 I've built my current pc to beat the new consoles and beamng still lags a bit on it. (40fps range) I haven't tested ROR on it yet though. So I'll have to check that when I get back to Japan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dantesinferno52 Posted December 26, 2013 Share Posted December 26, 2013 Older computers non gaming or gaming lag on ROR or BeamNG I would know I get 20 fps on ROR and 8 FPS on BeamNG.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MonsterJam2008 Posted December 26, 2013 Share Posted December 26, 2013 If you have a non gaming or really old gaming pc, you will see better performance in ror then in BeamNG If you have a recent gaming pc, then you will see better performance in BeamNG then ror I don't get why this is such a debate... Type of Computer: Custom built desktop CPU: fx-8350 4.0 Ghz GPU: HD 7970 3Gb RAM: Corsair Vengence 16 gb 1600 Mhz Motherboard: MSI 990-FXA GD-80 Hard Drive: Western Digital 2Tb PSU: Corsair CX 750w Beamng Max: Tech demo level Min 39 Max 96 Avg 67.603 Beamng Min: Tech demo level Min 74 Max 146 Avg 121.442 RoR Max: WF 14 Beta Min 57 Max 61 Avg 59.917 RoR MIn: WF 14 Beta Min 148 Max 161 Avg 158.008 http://sim-monsters.com/index.php?/topic/6068-computer-specs-and-ror-fps/page-2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mastertaco Posted December 27, 2013 Share Posted December 27, 2013 ill just step in and say this too all i know BeamNG HATES big tires, theres a crawler for it(john campbell Moonbuggy its called) it has some 40's~ on it and when it lands hard the tires will turn inside out(or half/portions the tire will turn invisible) and they are rock hard too(people on beamng forums say that you can even get a larger tire to flex slightley without it glitching to hell) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mastertaco Posted February 28, 2014 Share Posted February 28, 2014 ill just step in and say this too all i know BeamNG HATES big tires, theres a crawler for it(john campbell Moonbuggy its called) it has some 40's~ on it and when it lands hard the tires will turn inside out(or half/portions the tire will turn invisible) and they are rock hard too(people on beamng forums say that you can even get a larger tire to flex slightley without it glitching to hell) i stand corrected Truck is awesome works good tires barely screw up but will only get better with time Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
monstabubba Posted February 28, 2014 Share Posted February 28, 2014 EDIT: Double post whoops sorry make that *triple Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now